|
(View our interviews below with selected Congressional minds and then note the SCA profiler's comments.) WARNING: Certain quotes by the Congressional Minds profiled below are so unbelievable that you may need to watch the video several times to fully understand their plundering mindset. |
![]() |
| California
Rep.Pete
Stark comments that, in government, that the more debt you have, the wealthier you are. When the interviewer points out that this is impossible, Rep Stark explodes into a rage of questions about the interviewer's lack of a Masters Degree in economic theory and begins a tirade of various obscenities. We have removed the inappropriate language by Rep. Stark since this is a family program. Observe an advanced case of Congressional doublespeak in action! Our Profile of a California mind: Mr. Stark suffers from the common Congressional delusion that Congress can spend itself rich. As a young man he likely believed you could drink yourself sober as well. This profile manifests itself in yelling, insulting, and using of profanity when confronted with certain economic truths that any business owner learned in his first week of operations. Mr. Stark has "served" 37 years. Perhaps by year 40 he will understand basic economics. |
|
| Mr.Tim
Geithner states that he has never held a "real" job and that since graduate school he has held employment only in the government sector of the job market. Our Profile of a Treasury mind: We really hate to nit-pick, but wouldn't most folks with common sense (i.e. the non-Criminal/Congressional mindset) believe that IF:
This Congressional mind illness is typical of appointed as well as elected officials. It's known as "the rules that everyone else must live by don't apply to me" syndrome. |
|
| Analysis
of Rep. Barney
Frank offers a rare view into the Criminal/ Congressional mind. He states that we should concentrate solely on an "immediate increase in spending"and "a dose of Keynesian economics." Barney sees no long-term fiscal damage to unlimited spending because "there are plenty of rich people that we can tax and get the money back." Our Profile of a Congressional mind: Our diagnosis calls for us to be frank with Barney. His Congressional mindset ignores that fact that states like New Jersey, California, New York, Maryland,etc. have all seen their tax revenues plummet as folks leave rather than be treated as a financial voodoo doll that Barney can stick every time he needs more money. Despite Washington's attempt to stop it, the same exodus is happening at a national level. People are leaving in record numbers to avoid the coming tax wave. Our treatment recommendations are contained in a modern day revision of the classic book Animal Farm. Click here for the updated and economized version of the supply and demand story.and here for the Wall Street Journal article on the coming Wealth Exodus. Send Barney a copy of these articles by using this link. |
|
| When
questioned about the Constitutionality of forcing folks to buy a health
care contract, Rep. Phil Hare is caught red-handed saying, " I don't worry about the Constitution." Our Profile of a "Hare"-brained mind: This is one of the most dangerous of all Congressional mind diseases. It removes any sense of absolute values. In our opinion, Mr. Hare requires intervention therapy that includes forcing an answer to the following type of question(s). Since you don't worry about the Constitution, are you: equally non-worried about the concept of private property rights? If so, why stop at health care? Couldn't the Congress provide for housing, automobiles, guaranteed pensions (they are working on that one), full-time employment, and a right to free gasoline? If that pesky Constitutional concept of limited government is not anything to "worry" about, why not provide the above needs? People like this are dangerous to your financial health. Avoid close contact at all costs. |
|
| Vice
President Joe Biden, in an interview explaining how to claim some new 2009 tax breaks, proclaims, "I don't deserve a tax break." Our Profile of a Vice Presidential mind: It seems the first causalty of elected office is the ability to see your own inconsistencies. Don't get me wrong on this. I'm fine with any citizen taking a benefit that the tax code allows them to utilize. I'm not so fine with saying "I don't deserve a tax break" and claiming $62,954 of tax breaks on one's return. Recommended treatment entails as many voters as possible letting this public offical know that he doesn't have to paint himself as undeserving. What he does need to do is work to lower spending and the tax rate on all of us including himself. We believe that this will totally cure the guilt complex that afflicts him. |
|
| |
"I
do think at a certain point you've made enough money." Our Profile of a Presidential Mind Our recommendation calls for a cold dose of the reality of exactly where this mindset leads us economically. If the above is true at "a certain point" then:
|
![]() |
Congress brings a Nightmare to
small
businesses that would terrify Freddy Krueger !
While we were busy with tax season, Congress has been attempting to
pass two
nightmarish tax bills. Don't wait - call your Congressman now
to stop these bills dead
in their tracks.1--Hidden in Section 9006 of the healthcare bill is a potential requirement that will cause every business to issue 1099s to all vendors. Presently, 1099s are required for individuals and partnerships but not to corporate vendors. Under current law, 1099s are issued only for rents, services, and financial-based transactions. Section 9006 would require 1099s to all vendors for all transactions over a set amount, creating a cost accounting nightmare for businesses both small and large. We used the words potential requirement because our Treasury Secretary (see above analysis) is given the power to limit the scope of this law. Let's make certain that Secretary Geither sees that costly record keeping law is not good for business or the economy. 2--S-Corp owners beware! New law unfairly penalizes small businesses with less than 4 employees! The short version of this story is that S Corporations with less than 4 employees would be taxed at a higher rate than their larger competitors. At a minimum, the difference would be an extra 2.9% solely on the basis of their size. In addition, the rules for applying this law would easily add thousands of dollars to a company's accounting costs. More details will be on the blog this week, but call now and oppose HR 4213. |
![]() |
The 2009 movie Hire Me! was about an
elaborate ponzi scheme. There is no such trickery to the new Hiring Incentivives
to Restore
Employment Act
signed by the President earlier this year. If your new
employee
(hired after 2/3/2010) has been unemployed for 60 days, wages paid
after 3/18/2010 qualify for exemption from the 6.2% FICA normally paid
by the employer. In addition, your business may qualify for up to a
$1,000 tax credit per employee for those employed 52 continuous weeks. Let's recap just how helpful this credit could be to your company.
You'll need this form from the IRS to begin the process. Could this credit apply to hiring your previously- furloughed spouse from a family business? Clients are welcome to contact us for an answer. |
| Join our Facebook page for free tax updates on your FB home page. | Post
a question, make a comment, or sound off against Washington on our blog! Check for weekly tax updates at http://scataxblog.com. Here's a sample of some of the debates on our blog |
|
|